AltScreener

← Back to Library

Understanding Deep dive on the new 666x coin: A Technical Analysis for Alt Asset Traders

By Altscreener AI
cryptocurrencydefitechnical-analysistradingdeepdive666xcoin

Deep Dive: The “666X” Cryptocurrency Token

The 666X token is a recently launched meme-inspired cryptocurrency that’s attracting attention on the Solana network. Branded as “The Beast AI”, it bills itself with slogans like “Earn sins with your profits,” positioning itself as a chaotic, hype-driven project (www.livecoinwatch.com). In practice, however, 666X is an extremely small altcoin with virtually no track record. It trades only on decentralized Solana DEXes (primarily Raydium), has a circulating supply on the order of 109 tokens, and sees negligible volumes. For technical traders, 666X offers few reliable signals – liquidity is razor-thin and price info varies by source. Below we unpack the token’s details, data and warning signs.

Tokenomics & Supply

  • Symbol & Allegiance: 666X (sometimes subtitled “The Beast AI”) is a Solana-based SPL token. It has also appeared under the same ticker on other chains (more on that below), but the primary listing (and only trading activity) is on Solana. Market trackers describe 666X as a “meme token born to dominate the Solana chain with chaos and charisma” (www.livecoinwatch.com).
  • Total and Circulating Supply: According to available data, 1,000,000,000 (1 billion) 666X tokens were minted (max supply), with effectively the same figure as total supply. LiveCoinWatch reports about 969 million tokens in circulation (www.livecoinwatch.com) (suggesting ~97% is active). There is no on-chain “minting on demand” after launch, but anecdotal reports (and one chain-scan tool) suggest the contract’s supply controls are open (see Risks below). Any price analysis should note that practically the entire supply exists and can trade.
  • Contract Control: The contract is renounced (ownership turned off) per token scanner reports (mizar.com), ostensibly meaning developers no longer have special privileges like arbitrarily minting new tokens or changing rules. On Solana, the block explorer shows the token’s address (e.g. `GRbsDiby...ump`) with all supply in place. Mizar’s scanner for a similarly-named Base-chain counterpart shows “no honeypot” and “renounced contract”, reinforcing that the Solana token as listed seems permission-less (mizar.com).
  • Inflation: All evidence is that 100% of 666X is pre-minted. Blockspot and LiveCoinWatch both indicate circ and max supply equal ~1B (blockspot.io) (www.livecoinwatch.com). Thus there is no incremental “airdrop” or mining; all tokens existed at genesis.

Price & Market Data

  • Current Price: 666X trades at a minuscule price in USD terms. As of this writing, price trackers vary: LiveCoinWatch lists roughly $0.00000944 per token (www.livecoinwatch.com), and Solana Explorer data shows ~$0.0000096 (www.solanatracker.io). GeckoTerminal (Raydium) logs is shows ~$0.00002103 (www.geckoterminal.com). The discrepancy arises from ultra-low liquidity and sparse trades, meaning quotes can swing wildly. In round terms, 666X is on the order of ten-millionths of a dollar per token.
  • Market Capitalization: Even fully diluted, 666X is an extremely tiny cap. LiveCoinWatch reports a market cap of around \$9–21K (www.livecoinwatch.com) (www.geckoterminal.com). GeckoTerminal shows a “Market Cap”/FDV of roughly \$21.5K (price × 1B supply) (www.geckoterminal.com). Again, the wide range exists because aside from very limited trading data, $0.00001×1B = $10K, while Gecko’s higher price yields ~$21K. Either way, think in tens of thousands of dollars – far below any mainstream rank.
  • Trading Volume: Reported 24-hour volume is rattlingly low. LiveCoinWatch shows about \$195 traded in the last 24h (www.livecoinwatch.com). In contrast, GeckoTerminal’s Raydium pool data claims ~$104.3K volume (www.geckoterminal.com) – a roughly 500× discrepancy. This likely reflects a single pumped trade or data lag. In practice, expect at most a few hundred dollars of actual swapping per day, per latest confirmed data. In sum, volume is near zero relative to almost any mainstream crypto.
  • All-Time High (ATH): According to LiveCoinWatch, 666X’s peak price was around \$0.000016 (www.livecoinwatch.com). That translates to an all-time-high market cap on the order of $\17–$32K (depending on time). These are essentially rounding errors in crypto terms. Present price is below that ATH, meaning 666X has only moved within its tiny range and lacks a significant breakout to date.
  • Price Charts & Trends: Because trades happen only on DEX pools and in tiny amounts, reliable charts are scant. Some aggregator charts show a recent ramp from ~$0.000009 up to ~$0.000016 (hit in late August 2025 (coincodex.com)) then a pullback. But even these moves involved negligible capital. Overall, technical patterns or support/resistance lines cannot be trusted. At such scale, slippage and spread dominate.

Trading Pairs & Liquidity

  • DEX Listings: 666X is only listed on Solana decentralized exchanges. The primary venues are Raydium and FluxBeam, both Solana DEXs. (66X appears nowhere on major CEXs, and not yet on routers across chains. Mizar confirms the Base-chain variant is “not traded yet” (mizar.com).) As of now, 666X has no listings on CoinGecko or CoinMarketCap; sites like Coinranking show it in “preview mode” with no data (coinranking.com).
  • Pool Liquidity: Liquidity is virtually nonexistent. Geekoterminal lists about \$18.6K in the Raydium pool (www.geckoterminal.com), but DexScreener indicates another Raydium CLMM pool with <$1 (868 tokens) paired with 0.000013 SOL (dexscreener.com). In practical terms, you would crash the price with even a few dollars of buy/sell. Reported Liquidity ~\$18.6K (www.geckoterminal.com) might be the total capital behind one pool, but DexScreener’s finding is a reminder that millions of tokens sit with near-zero backing.
  • Number of Holders: Holding wallets are very few. GeckoTerminal shows about 583 addresses participating in the Raydium pool (www.geckoterminal.com). Given ~969M tokens out there, that means effectively 583 actors collectively strain to move the price. True “orderbook” depth is non-existent; any larger order would sweep the pool instantly.
  • Exchanges: There are no orderbook exchanges for 666X. All trades route through the aforementioned pools. Market-savvy traders must use a Solana wallet and swap on the specified Raydium or FluxBeam pool. (For example, solpurchase and set slippage extremely high.)
  • Volatility: With volume effectively zero (24h vol at most tens or hundreds of dollars), 666X’s price is highly sensitive to even one trade. Aggressive market orders move it by double-digit percentages, as a few hundred dollars blows through shallow pools. In fact, LiveCoinWatch’s 24h range ($0.000009–$0.000010, ~10% range) reflects just $195 volume (www.livecoinwatch.com). Such unrealistic volatility makes technical analysis futile; a single whale or bot will skew any indicator.

Multiple 666X Tokens / Chains

The ticker “666X” has appeared on more than one blockchain. Notably:

  • Solana (SPL): The main subject of this article. A Solana SPL token (address `GRbsDibyh7iJrkk18bm49qk7NhkUsAWh9hE3DKVmpump`) launched (around mid-2025), and trades on Raydium/FluxBeam. All data above refers to this version. It is unverified by large trackers, so caution is needed.
  • Base (Ethereum Layer-2): Independently, a “The Beast AI (666X)” token contract was created on Coinbase’s Base chain on April 1, 2025 (mizar.com). It has only 10 million total supply (mizar.com) and, as of this writing, no trading activity (mizar.com). Market scanners report $0 liquidity and market cap $0 for the Base 666X (mizar.com). It is essentially stale/unused. If Base token holders exist, they are likely insiders.
  • Binance Smart Chain (BSC): Yet another 666X project launched June 23, 2023 (coindizzy.com) with an astronomical supply (1,000,000,000,000,000 tokens). It has no legitimate trades (price = $0 on explorers, 24h vol = $0) (coindizzy.com). All metrics are zero. Worse, blockchain scans reveal malicious “honeypot” coding: the contract has a trade disable switch, a blacklist function, and the ability to mint new tokens or change fees even now (coindizzy.com). In plain terms, this BSC 666X is a likely scam and should not be confused with the Solana token. (Many new meme coins on BSC turn out to be traps; CoinDizzy flagged this one with “Blacklist: Detected”, “Supply change: Detected”, etc. (coindizzy.com).)

These different projects share a name but are entirely separate. The Solana 666X currently has the only real trading activity (albeit tiny). Alt-traders must beware: any data source might conflate these if ticker symbols overlap. Always double-check the chain and contract address.

Screening Risks & Red Flags

From a screening perspective, 666X ticks many danger boxes:

  • Unverified/Limited Data: Coinranking marks it “preview mode – no price data” with “several ranking penalties – low volume, limited exchange listings, unverified supply” (coinranking.com). Many trackers only list it with caution flags or omit it entirely. Users must rely on small DEX aggregators, which themselves show inconsistent data.
  • Extremely Low Liquidity: Trading 666X means huge slippage. An open position even slightly sized will likely never find a proper exit. The DexScreener and GeckoTerminal data highlight this: one Raydium CLMM pool holds less than \$1 worth of tokens (dexscreener.com), and all pools together under \$20K (www.geckoterminal.com). For a technical trader, that means any familiar indicator (MA, RSI, etc.) is meaningless – price jumps from wash trading or manual prints dominate.
  • Risk Score / Verification: On-chain scanners give the Solana token a high-risk score (2/10) (www.solanatracker.io). 2/10 (on SolanaTracker) indicates potential issues. Notably, lack of social channels – SolanaTracker notes “No social media” (www.solanatracker.io), and there’s no accessible Twitter/GitHub/official site (Blockspot’s site link is inactive (blockspot.io)). This anonymity is typical of speculative tokens and prevents transparency.
  • Supply Control: Despite being “renounced”, blockchain tools reveal the contract’s ability to alter fees or mint after the fact (similar to the BSC version). LiveCoinWatch and Blockspot don’t show any dynamic features, but prudent traders should remember meme coins often do strange switcheroos. The BSC 666X’s findings (blacklist, mint, fee change) are so glaring that one wonders if the Solana code originated from the same template. Until audited, assume the team could change rules behind the scenes.
  • Pump-and-Dump Potential: The combination of hype-slogan and tiny base (just 583 real holders!) is classic pump material. Any coordinated buying (via Telegram/Discord shill, perhaps) could spike price briefly, then inevitably collapse. The token’s design (no ceilings, potential fee kickers) suggests it’s built for “wild ride of community-driven hype” rather than sustainable use (www.livecoinwatch.com).
  • Screening Tools: Alt-screeners should flag 666X for “low market cap”, “low liquidity”, “limited market access”. Indeed, tools like CoinCodex warn of untrusted data (no news, 0 dominance) (coincodex.com). The BSC variant would flag as honeypot. The Base one currently flags as “not traded, $0 cap” (mizar.com). In practice, any screening system should categorize “666X” as a speculative meme token only, not a mainstream project.

Key Metrics Summary

Conclusion

In sum, 666X is a borderline fun joke token at best and likely a speculative trap at worst. Its tiny scale means it is extremely high-risk: virtually no liquidity, possible contract sneaky features, and a total dependence on meme-hype. For a technical trader, typical analysis tools break down here. Any interest in 666X is purely speculative (or contrarian), and should be approached with utmost caution. For our screening service, 666X triggers multiple alerts: low cap, low volume, unverified project, multi-chain homonyms, and scam-like code. In the altcoin space, 666X is an example of how “moonshot” tokens can actually be untradeable black holes rather than gold.

Sources: On-chain explorers and token trackers for 666X (Solana) (www.livecoinwatch.com) (www.geckoterminal.com) (www.solanatracker.io); token scanners (Mizar) (mizar.com) (mizar.com); Dexscreener (dexscreener.com); coindizzy honeypot audit (BSC 666X) (coindizzy.com); blockspot info (blockspot.io) (blockspot.io). Each provides partial data for price, supply, and risk. These combine to paint the above picture.